American Samoa vs Kiribati: Terms of trade adjustment
Terms of trade adjustment over time
- American Samoa
- Kiribati
How they compare
American Samoa currently reports 3.96 million constant LCU against 3.53 million constant LCU in Kiribati, a difference of 429,830 constant LCU.
That makes American Samoa's figure about 1.1 times Kiribati's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Kiribati ahead.
American Samoa ranks 94th and Kiribati ranks 95th of 179 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | American Samoa | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -46.21 million constant LCU | -102,643 constant LCU | 46.11 million constant LCU | Kiribati |
| 2010s | -38.12 million constant LCU | 1.18 million constant LCU | 39.30 million constant LCU | Kiribati |
| 2020s | -14.50 million constant LCU | 2.09 million constant LCU | 16.59 million constant LCU | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher terms of trade adjustment, American Samoa or Kiribati?
- American Samoa, at 3.96 million constant LCU against 3.53 million constant LCU in Kiribati as of 2022.
- What is the difference in terms of trade adjustment between American Samoa and Kiribati?
- 429,830 constant LCU, with American Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for American Samoa and Kiribati?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2022.
- How do American Samoa and Kiribati rank globally for terms of trade adjustment?
- American Samoa ranks 94th and Kiribati ranks 95th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Terms of trade adjustment (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The terms of trade adjustment is equal to the capacity to import (current price value of exports of goods and services deflated by the import price index) less exports of goods and services in constant prices. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.