Thailand vs Zambia: Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Thailand
128.45 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
122.63 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Thailand rank
130th
Zambia rank
132nd

Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Thailand
  • Zambia
0200400600196119922023

How they compare

Thailand currently reports 128.45 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 122.63 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Zambia, a difference of 5.82 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

Across all 60 years both countries report, Thailand has been ahead every year.

Thailand ranks 130th and Zambia ranks 132nd of 178 countries.

Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Thailand Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 56.97 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 11.1 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 45.86 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Thailand
1970s 101.67 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 46 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 55.67 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Thailand
1980s 304.31 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 118.12 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 186.19 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Thailand
1990s 458.53 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 174.59 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 283.93 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Thailand
2000s 305.28 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 158.25 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 147.03 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Thailand
2010s 183.29 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 110.41 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 72.88 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Thailand
2020s 132.29 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 110.6 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 21.69 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Thailand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher technical cooperation grants (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Thailand or Zambia?
Thailand, at 128.45 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 122.63 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Zambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in technical cooperation grants (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Thailand and Zambia?
5.82 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Thailand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Thailand and Zambia?
60 years are reported by both, from 1964 to 2023.
How do Thailand and Zambia rank globally for technical cooperation grants (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Thailand ranks 130th and Zambia ranks 132nd of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Thailand vs Zambia: Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/technical-cooperation-grants-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/thailand/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/technical-cooperation-grants-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/thailand/zambia/">Thailand vs Zambia: Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
179 places, 8,676 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.