Mali vs Zimbabwe: Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Mali
98.13 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
100.35 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mali rank
142nd
Zimbabwe rank
140th

Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Mali
  • Zimbabwe
0100200300400500196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 100.35 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 98.13 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Mali, a difference of 2.22 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1964 it was Mali ahead.

Mali ranks 142nd and Zimbabwe ranks 140th of 178 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mali averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mali Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 7.91 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1.6 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 6.31 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Mali
1970s 16.08 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 10.73 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 5.35 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Mali
1980s 57.24 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 161.15 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 103.9 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 94.84 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 308.6 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 213.76 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 99.2 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 156.19 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 56.99 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 104.8 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 169 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 64.19 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 114.66 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 136.14 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 21.48 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher technical cooperation grants (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Mali or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 100.35 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 98.13 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Mali as of 2023.
What is the difference in technical cooperation grants (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Mali and Zimbabwe?
2.22 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Zimbabwe?
60 years are reported by both, from 1964 to 2023.
How do Mali and Zimbabwe rank globally for technical cooperation grants (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Mali ranks 142nd and Zimbabwe ranks 140th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mali vs Zimbabwe: Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/technical-cooperation-grants-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mali/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/technical-cooperation-grants-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mali/zimbabwe/">Mali vs Zimbabwe: Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
179 places, 8,676 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.