Iran vs Zambia: Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Iran
115.52 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
122.63 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Iran rank
135th
Zambia rank
132nd

Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Iran
  • Zambia
050100150200250196119922023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 122.63 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 115.52 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Iran, a difference of 7.11 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Iran's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 60 shared years of data; in 1964 it was Iran ahead.

Iran ranks 135th and Zambia ranks 132nd of 178 countries.

Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iran Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 5.09 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 11.1 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 6.01 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
1970s 10.67 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 46 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 35.34 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
1980s 22.82 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 118.12 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 95.3 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
1990s 62.6 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 174.59 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 111.99 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
2000s 42.98 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 158.25 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 115.27 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
2010s 58.28 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 110.41 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 52.13 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
2020s 100.58 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 110.6 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 10.02 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher technical cooperation grants (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Iran or Zambia?
Zambia, at 122.63 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 115.52 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Iran as of 2023.
What is the difference in technical cooperation grants (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Iran and Zambia?
7.11 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iran and Zambia?
60 years are reported by both, from 1964 to 2023.
How do Iran and Zambia rank globally for technical cooperation grants (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Iran ranks 135th and Zambia ranks 132nd of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iran vs Zambia: Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/technical-cooperation-grants-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/iran-islamic-rep/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/technical-cooperation-grants-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/iran-islamic-rep/zambia/">Iran vs Zambia: Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
179 places, 8,676 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.