Gabon vs Zimbabwe: Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Gabon
95.65 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
100.35 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Gabon rank
143rd
Zimbabwe rank
140th

Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Gabon
  • Zimbabwe
0100200300400500196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 100.35 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 95.65 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Gabon, a difference of 4.7 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1964 it was Gabon ahead.

Gabon ranks 143rd and Zimbabwe ranks 140th of 178 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Gabon averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gabon Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 24.3 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1.6 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 22.7 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Gabon
1970s 66.31 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 10.73 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 55.58 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Gabon
1980s 123.59 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 161.15 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 37.56 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 155.69 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 308.6 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 152.91 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 160.12 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 156.19 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 3.92 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Gabon
2010s 115.89 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 169 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 53.11 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 103.74 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 136.14 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 32.41 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher technical cooperation grants (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Gabon or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 100.35 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 95.65 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Gabon as of 2023.
What is the difference in technical cooperation grants (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Gabon and Zimbabwe?
4.7 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gabon and Zimbabwe?
60 years are reported by both, from 1964 to 2023.
How do Gabon and Zimbabwe rank globally for technical cooperation grants (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Gabon ranks 143rd and Zimbabwe ranks 140th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gabon vs Zimbabwe: Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/technical-cooperation-grants-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/gabon/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/technical-cooperation-grants-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/gabon/zimbabwe/">Gabon vs Zimbabwe: Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
179 places, 8,676 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.