French Polynesia vs Low & middle income: Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

French Polynesia
81,246 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 1999
Low & middle income
263.29 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
French Polynesia rank
3rd
Low & middle income rank
1st

Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • French Polynesia
  • Low & middle income
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k196619942023

How they compare

French Polynesia currently reports 81,246 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 263.29 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Low & middle income, a difference of 80,983 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes French Polynesia's figure about 308.6 times Low & middle income's.

Across all 30 years both countries report, French Polynesia has been ahead every year.

French Polynesia ranks 3rd and Low & middle income ranks 1st of 178 countries.

French Polynesia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade French Polynesia Low & middle income Difference Ahead
1970s 10,424 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 41.04 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 10,383 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre French Polynesia
1980s 43,314 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 115.44 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 43,198 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre French Polynesia
1990s 68,898 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 190.29 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 68,707 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre French Polynesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher technical cooperation grants (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, French Polynesia or Low & middle income?
French Polynesia, at 81,246 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 263.29 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Low & middle income as of 1999.
What is the difference in technical cooperation grants (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between French Polynesia and Low & middle income?
80,983 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with French Polynesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Low & middle income?
30 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 1999.
How do French Polynesia and Low & middle income rank globally for technical cooperation grants (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
French Polynesia ranks 3rd and Low & middle income ranks 1st of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

French Polynesia vs Low & middle income: Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/technical-cooperation-grants-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/french-polynesia/low-and-middle-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/technical-cooperation-grants-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/french-polynesia/low-and-middle-income/">French Polynesia vs Low & middle income: Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
179 places, 8,676 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.