Equatorial Guinea vs Namibia: Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Equatorial Guinea
60.67 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
60.38 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
151st
Namibia rank
153rd

Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Namibia
02505007501.0k1.2k197219972023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 60.67 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 60.38 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 0.29 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 40 shared years of data; in 1983 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 151st and Namibia ranks 153rd of 178 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 4 and Namibia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Namibia Difference Ahead
1980s 277.18 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 13.82 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 263.36 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1990s 594.72 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 70.22 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 524.5 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2000s 417.83 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 63.78 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 354.04 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2010s 157.19 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 51.24 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 105.96 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2020s 57.52 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 65.08 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 7.56 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher technical cooperation grants (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Equatorial Guinea or Namibia?
Equatorial Guinea, at 60.67 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 60.38 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in technical cooperation grants (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Equatorial Guinea and Namibia?
0.29 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Namibia?
40 years are reported by both, from 1983 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Namibia rank globally for technical cooperation grants (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 151st and Namibia ranks 153rd of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Namibia: Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/technical-cooperation-grants-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/technical-cooperation-grants-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/namibia/">Equatorial Guinea vs Namibia: Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
179 places, 8,676 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.