Dominica vs Gambia: Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Dominica
2,770 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Gambia
2,840 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Dominica rank
34th
Gambia rank
33rd

Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Dominica
  • Gambia
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k196219922023

How they compare

Gambia currently reports 2,840 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 2,770 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Dominica, a difference of 70 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 50 shared years of data; in 1974 it was Dominica ahead.

Dominica ranks 34th and Gambia ranks 33rd of 178 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Dominica averaged higher in 4 and Gambia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominica Gambia Difference Ahead
1970s 635.56 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 409.26 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 226.3 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Dominica
1980s 3,247 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,814 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,432 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Dominica
1990s 4,813 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,925 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2,888 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Dominica
2000s 3,710 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,024 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2,686 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Dominica
2010s 1,851 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2,210 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 359.6 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Gambia
2020s 2,964 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 3,240 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 275.64 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Gambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher technical cooperation grants (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Dominica or Gambia?
Gambia, at 2,840 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 2,770 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Dominica as of 2023.
What is the difference in technical cooperation grants (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Dominica and Gambia?
70 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Gambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Gambia?
50 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2023.
How do Dominica and Gambia rank globally for technical cooperation grants (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Dominica ranks 34th and Gambia ranks 33rd of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dominica vs Gambia: Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/technical-cooperation-grants-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/dominica/gambia-the/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/technical-cooperation-grants-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/dominica/gambia-the/">Dominica vs Gambia: Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
179 places, 8,676 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.