Cuba vs India: Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Cuba
176.21 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
India
189.67 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
123rd
India rank
121st

Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Cuba
  • India
0100200300400500196119922023

How they compare

India currently reports 189.67 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 176.21 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Cuba, a difference of 13.46 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes India's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 123rd and India ranks 121st of 178 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 5 and India in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba India Difference Ahead
1960s 4 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 6.77 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2.77 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre India
1970s 48.32 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 23.6 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 24.72 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Cuba
1980s 73.52 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 73.88 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 0.361 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre India
1990s 132.61 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 121.35 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 11.26 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 299.19 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 110.08 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 189.11 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2010s 193.47 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 130.45 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 63.02 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 206.85 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 176.9 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 29.94 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher technical cooperation grants (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Cuba or India?
India, at 189.67 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 176.21 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in technical cooperation grants (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Cuba and India?
13.46 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with India ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and India?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cuba and India rank globally for technical cooperation grants (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Cuba ranks 123rd and India ranks 121st of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs India: Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/technical-cooperation-grants-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cuba/india/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/technical-cooperation-grants-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cuba/india/">Cuba vs India: Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
179 places, 8,676 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.