Chad vs Libya: Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Chad
43.33 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Libya
38.28 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chad rank
161st
Libya rank
164th

Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Chad
  • Libya
020406080100196119922023

How they compare

Chad currently reports 43.33 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 38.28 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Libya, a difference of 5.05 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Chad's figure about 1.1 times Libya's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 58 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chad ahead.

Chad ranks 161st and Libya ranks 164th of 178 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 6 and Libya in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Libya Difference Ahead
1960s 5.6 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1.26 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 4.34 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Chad
1970s 15.13 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1.36 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 13.77 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Chad
1980s 24.22 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 3.2 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 21.02 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Chad
1990s 43.49 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2.1 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 41.39 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Chad
2000s 32.03 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 8.54 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 23.49 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Chad
2010s 19.43 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 29.99 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 10.56 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Libya
2020s 37.91 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 37.21 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 0.7017 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Chad

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher technical cooperation grants (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Chad or Libya?
Chad, at 43.33 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 38.28 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Libya as of 2023.
What is the difference in technical cooperation grants (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Chad and Libya?
5.05 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Chad ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Libya?
58 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chad and Libya rank globally for technical cooperation grants (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Chad ranks 161st and Libya ranks 164th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Libya: Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/technical-cooperation-grants-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chad/libya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/technical-cooperation-grants-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chad/libya/">Chad vs Libya: Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
179 places, 8,676 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.