Barbados vs Rwanda: Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Barbados
4,302 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2010
Rwanda
3,986 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
27th
Rwanda rank
28th

Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Barbados
  • Rwanda
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k12.5k196119922023

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 4,302 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 3,986 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 316 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Barbados's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 27th and Rwanda ranks 28th of 178 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 5 and Rwanda in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 1,308 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 304.82 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,003 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
1970s 3,926 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,131 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2,795 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
1980s 4,965 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2,540 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2,425 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
1990s 4,493 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 3,307 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,186 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
2000s 6,005 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 3,553 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2,452 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 4,302 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 5,058 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 756.04 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher technical cooperation grants (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Barbados or Rwanda?
Barbados, at 4,302 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 3,986 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2010.
What is the difference in technical cooperation grants (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Barbados and Rwanda?
316 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Rwanda?
45 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2010.
How do Barbados and Rwanda rank globally for technical cooperation grants (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Barbados ranks 27th and Rwanda ranks 28th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Rwanda: Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/technical-cooperation-grants-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/barbados/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/technical-cooperation-grants-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/barbados/rwanda/">Barbados vs Rwanda: Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
179 places, 8,676 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.