Angola vs Libya: Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Angola
37.42 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Libya
38.28 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Angola rank
165th
Libya rank
164th

Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Angola
  • Libya
020406080100196119922023

How they compare

Libya currently reports 38.28 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 37.42 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Angola, a difference of 0.86 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Libya ahead.

Angola ranks 165th and Libya ranks 164th of 178 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 4 and Libya in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Libya Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0209 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1.7 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1.68 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Libya
1970s 3.98 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1.36 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2.61 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Angola
1980s 21.69 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 3.2 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 18.49 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Angola
1990s 52.09 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2.1 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 50 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Angola
2000s 53.2 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 8.54 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 44.66 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Angola
2010s 27.75 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 29.99 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2.24 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Libya
2020s 36.45 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 37.21 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 0.7636 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Libya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher technical cooperation grants (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Angola or Libya?
Libya, at 38.28 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 37.42 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Angola as of 2023.
What is the difference in technical cooperation grants (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Angola and Libya?
0.86 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Libya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Libya?
54 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Angola and Libya rank globally for technical cooperation grants (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Angola ranks 165th and Libya ranks 164th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Libya: Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/technical-cooperation-grants-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/angola/libya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/technical-cooperation-grants-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/angola/libya/">Angola vs Libya: Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
179 places, 8,676 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.