Suriname vs Zambia: Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre

Suriname
34,533 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
43,829 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Suriname rank
170th
Zambia rank
167th

Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Suriname
  • Zambia
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k196119922023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 43,829 current LCU per square kilometre against 34,533 current LCU per square kilometre in Suriname, a difference of 9,296 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.3 times Suriname's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Zambia ahead.

Suriname ranks 170th and Zambia ranks 167th of 195 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Suriname averaged higher in 1 and Zambia in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Suriname Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0363 current LCU per square kilometre 0.1159 current LCU per square kilometre 0.0796 current LCU per square kilometre Zambia
1970s 0.6464 current LCU per square kilometre 0.2126 current LCU per square kilometre 0.4338 current LCU per square kilometre Suriname
1980s 1.29 current LCU per square kilometre 1.82 current LCU per square kilometre 0.5234 current LCU per square kilometre Zambia
1990s 146.3 current LCU per square kilometre 523.36 current LCU per square kilometre 377.06 current LCU per square kilometre Zambia
2000s 2,867 current LCU per square kilometre 4,552 current LCU per square kilometre 1,684 current LCU per square kilometre Zambia
2010s 6,873 current LCU per square kilometre 16,116 current LCU per square kilometre 9,243 current LCU per square kilometre Zambia
2020s 16,336 current LCU per square kilometre 30,881 current LCU per square kilometre 14,545 current LCU per square kilometre Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre, Suriname or Zambia?
Zambia, at 43,829 current LCU per square kilometre against 34,533 current LCU per square kilometre in Suriname as of 2023.
What is the difference in taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre between Suriname and Zambia?
9,296 current LCU per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Suriname and Zambia?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Suriname and Zambia rank globally for taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Suriname ranks 170th and Zambia ranks 167th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Suriname vs Zambia: Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/taxes-less-subsidies-on-products-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/suriname/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/taxes-less-subsidies-on-products-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/suriname/zambia/">Suriname vs Zambia: Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
196 places, 7,867 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.