Suriname vs Tunisia: Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre

Suriname
34,533 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
41,823 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Suriname rank
170th
Tunisia rank
168th

Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Suriname
  • Tunisia
020.0k40.0k60.0k196119922023

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 41,823 current LCU per square kilometre against 34,533 current LCU per square kilometre in Suriname, a difference of 7,290 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.2 times Suriname's.

Across all 59 years both countries report, Tunisia has been ahead every year.

Suriname ranks 170th and Tunisia ranks 168th of 195 countries.

Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Suriname Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0363 current LCU per square kilometre 495.49 current LCU per square kilometre 495.46 current LCU per square kilometre Tunisia
1970s 0.6464 current LCU per square kilometre 1,453 current LCU per square kilometre 1,453 current LCU per square kilometre Tunisia
1980s 1.29 current LCU per square kilometre 5,281 current LCU per square kilometre 5,280 current LCU per square kilometre Tunisia
1990s 146.3 current LCU per square kilometre 13,919 current LCU per square kilometre 13,773 current LCU per square kilometre Tunisia
2000s 2,867 current LCU per square kilometre 25,348 current LCU per square kilometre 22,480 current LCU per square kilometre Tunisia
2010s 6,873 current LCU per square kilometre 37,942 current LCU per square kilometre 31,069 current LCU per square kilometre Tunisia
2020s 16,336 current LCU per square kilometre 45,346 current LCU per square kilometre 29,010 current LCU per square kilometre Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre, Suriname or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 41,823 current LCU per square kilometre against 34,533 current LCU per square kilometre in Suriname as of 2023.
What is the difference in taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre between Suriname and Tunisia?
7,290 current LCU per square kilometre, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Suriname and Tunisia?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Suriname and Tunisia rank globally for taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Suriname ranks 170th and Tunisia ranks 168th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Suriname vs Tunisia: Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/taxes-less-subsidies-on-products-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/suriname/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/taxes-less-subsidies-on-products-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/suriname/tunisia/">Suriname vs Tunisia: Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
196 places, 7,867 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.