Mauritius vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre

Mauritius
42.37 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
41.63 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius rank
19th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
20th

Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Mauritius
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
010.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M197619992023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 42.37 million current LCU per square kilometre against 41.63 million current LCU per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 737,000 current LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Mauritius ahead.

Mauritius ranks 19th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 20th of 195 countries.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1990s 4.41 million current LCU per square kilometre 277,586 current LCU per square kilometre 4.13 million current LCU per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 11.22 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.72 million current LCU per square kilometre 9.50 million current LCU per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 25.28 million current LCU per square kilometre 8.08 million current LCU per square kilometre 17.20 million current LCU per square kilometre Mauritius
2020s 33.24 million current LCU per square kilometre 31.76 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.47 million current LCU per square kilometre Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre, Mauritius or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Mauritius, at 42.37 million current LCU per square kilometre against 41.63 million current LCU per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2023.
What is the difference in taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre between Mauritius and Tanzania, United Republic of?
737,000 current LCU per square kilometre, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Tanzania, United Republic of?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Mauritius and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Mauritius ranks 19th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 20th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/taxes-less-subsidies-on-products-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/taxes-less-subsidies-on-products-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/tanzania/">Mauritius vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
196 places, 7,867 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.