Malta vs Pakistan: Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre

Malta
4.68 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan
5.30 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta rank
52nd
Pakistan rank
49th

Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Malta
  • Pakistan
02.0M4.0M6.0M196119922023

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 5.30 million current LCU per square kilometre against 4.68 million current LCU per square kilometre in Malta, a difference of 619,300 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.1 times Malta's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Malta ahead.

Malta ranks 52nd and Pakistan ranks 49th of 195 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 5 and Pakistan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Pakistan Difference Ahead
1970s 92,771 current LCU per square kilometre 11,954 current LCU per square kilometre 80,817 current LCU per square kilometre Malta
1980s 230,619 current LCU per square kilometre 62,403 current LCU per square kilometre 168,216 current LCU per square kilometre Malta
1990s 859,400 current LCU per square kilometre 211,274 current LCU per square kilometre 648,127 current LCU per square kilometre Malta
2000s 1.95 million current LCU per square kilometre 521,987 current LCU per square kilometre 1.43 million current LCU per square kilometre Malta
2010s 3.47 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.98 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.49 million current LCU per square kilometre Malta
2020s 4.18 million current LCU per square kilometre 4.48 million current LCU per square kilometre 296,128 current LCU per square kilometre Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre, Malta or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at 5.30 million current LCU per square kilometre against 4.68 million current LCU per square kilometre in Malta as of 2023.
What is the difference in taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre between Malta and Pakistan?
619,300 current LCU per square kilometre, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Pakistan?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Malta and Pakistan rank globally for taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Malta ranks 52nd and Pakistan ranks 49th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Pakistan: Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/taxes-less-subsidies-on-products-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/malta/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/taxes-less-subsidies-on-products-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/malta/pakistan/">Malta vs Pakistan: Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
196 places, 7,867 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.