Latvia vs United States of America: Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre

Latvia
76,748 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
United States of America
90,650 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2021
Latvia rank
160th
United States of America rank
158th

Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Latvia
  • United States of America
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k199520092023

How they compare

United States of America currently reports 90,650 current LCU per square kilometre against 76,748 current LCU per square kilometre in Latvia, a difference of 13,902 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes United States of America's figure about 1.2 times Latvia's.

Across all 25 years both countries report, United States of America has been ahead every year.

Latvia ranks 160th and United States of America ranks 158th of 195 countries.

United States of America has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia United States of America Difference Ahead
1990s 10,639 current LCU per square kilometre 36,428 current LCU per square kilometre 25,789 current LCU per square kilometre United States of America
2000s 23,749 current LCU per square kilometre 48,596 current LCU per square kilometre 24,847 current LCU per square kilometre United States of America
2010s 47,963 current LCU per square kilometre 70,685 current LCU per square kilometre 22,722 current LCU per square kilometre United States of America
2020s 64,912 current LCU per square kilometre 84,525 current LCU per square kilometre 19,614 current LCU per square kilometre United States of America

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre, Latvia or United States of America?
United States of America, at 90,650 current LCU per square kilometre against 76,748 current LCU per square kilometre in Latvia as of 2021.
What is the difference in taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre between Latvia and United States of America?
13,902 current LCU per square kilometre, with United States of America ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and United States of America?
25 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2021.
How do Latvia and United States of America rank globally for taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Latvia ranks 160th and United States of America ranks 158th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs United States of America: Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/taxes-less-subsidies-on-products-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/latvia/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/taxes-less-subsidies-on-products-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/latvia/united-states/">Latvia vs United States of America: Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
196 places, 7,867 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.