Jordan vs Zambia: Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre

Jordan
48,095 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
43,829 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Jordan rank
166th
Zambia rank
167th

Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Jordan
  • Zambia
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k196519942023

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 48,095 current LCU per square kilometre against 43,829 current LCU per square kilometre in Zambia, a difference of 4,266 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Jordan's figure about 1.1 times Zambia's.

Across all 59 years both countries report, Jordan has been ahead every year.

Jordan ranks 166th and Zambia ranks 167th of 195 countries.

Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jordan Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 208.07 current LCU per square kilometre 0.1159 current LCU per square kilometre 207.95 current LCU per square kilometre Jordan
1970s 541.7 current LCU per square kilometre 0.2126 current LCU per square kilometre 541.49 current LCU per square kilometre Jordan
1980s 2,330 current LCU per square kilometre 1.82 current LCU per square kilometre 2,328 current LCU per square kilometre Jordan
1990s 7,111 current LCU per square kilometre 523.36 current LCU per square kilometre 6,587 current LCU per square kilometre Jordan
2000s 13,246 current LCU per square kilometre 4,552 current LCU per square kilometre 8,694 current LCU per square kilometre Jordan
2010s 36,870 current LCU per square kilometre 16,116 current LCU per square kilometre 20,754 current LCU per square kilometre Jordan
2020s 47,484 current LCU per square kilometre 30,881 current LCU per square kilometre 16,604 current LCU per square kilometre Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre, Jordan or Zambia?
Jordan, at 48,095 current LCU per square kilometre against 43,829 current LCU per square kilometre in Zambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre between Jordan and Zambia?
4,266 current LCU per square kilometre, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Zambia?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Jordan and Zambia rank globally for taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Jordan ranks 166th and Zambia ranks 167th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jordan vs Zambia: Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/taxes-less-subsidies-on-products-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/jordan/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/taxes-less-subsidies-on-products-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/jordan/zambia/">Jordan vs Zambia: Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
196 places, 7,867 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.