Eswatini vs Portugal: Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre

Eswatini
345,501 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Portugal
379,489 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
121st
Portugal rank
119th

Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Eswatini
  • Portugal
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k196119922023

How they compare

Portugal currently reports 379,489 current LCU per square kilometre against 345,501 current LCU per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 33,988 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Portugal's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Portugal ahead.

Eswatini ranks 121st and Portugal ranks 119th of 195 countries.

Portugal has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Portugal Difference Ahead
1970s 1,737 current LCU per square kilometre 5,200 current LCU per square kilometre 3,464 current LCU per square kilometre Portugal
1980s 8,416 current LCU per square kilometre 29,999 current LCU per square kilometre 21,584 current LCU per square kilometre Portugal
1990s 52,966 current LCU per square kilometre 112,347 current LCU per square kilometre 59,381 current LCU per square kilometre Portugal
2000s 49,128 current LCU per square kilometre 216,972 current LCU per square kilometre 167,844 current LCU per square kilometre Portugal
2010s 173,949 current LCU per square kilometre 261,262 current LCU per square kilometre 87,314 current LCU per square kilometre Portugal
2020s 316,076 current LCU per square kilometre 335,005 current LCU per square kilometre 18,929 current LCU per square kilometre Portugal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre, Eswatini or Portugal?
Portugal, at 379,489 current LCU per square kilometre against 345,501 current LCU per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre between Eswatini and Portugal?
33,988 current LCU per square kilometre, with Portugal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Portugal?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Portugal rank globally for taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Eswatini ranks 121st and Portugal ranks 119th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Portugal: Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/taxes-less-subsidies-on-products-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/portugal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/taxes-less-subsidies-on-products-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/portugal/">Eswatini vs Portugal: Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
196 places, 7,867 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.