Cuba vs United States of America: Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre

Cuba
71,484 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
United States of America
90,650 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2021
Cuba rank
161st
United States of America rank
158th

Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Cuba
  • United States of America
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k197019962023

How they compare

United States of America currently reports 90,650 current LCU per square kilometre against 71,484 current LCU per square kilometre in Cuba, a difference of 19,166 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes United States of America's figure about 1.3 times Cuba's.

Across all 25 years both countries report, United States of America has been ahead every year.

Cuba ranks 161st and United States of America ranks 158th of 195 countries.

United States of America has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba United States of America Difference Ahead
1990s 3,370 current LCU per square kilometre 36,428 current LCU per square kilometre 33,058 current LCU per square kilometre United States of America
2000s 4,833 current LCU per square kilometre 48,596 current LCU per square kilometre 43,763 current LCU per square kilometre United States of America
2010s 9,104 current LCU per square kilometre 70,685 current LCU per square kilometre 61,580 current LCU per square kilometre United States of America
2020s 24,918 current LCU per square kilometre 84,525 current LCU per square kilometre 59,607 current LCU per square kilometre United States of America

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre, Cuba or United States of America?
United States of America, at 90,650 current LCU per square kilometre against 71,484 current LCU per square kilometre in Cuba as of 2021.
What is the difference in taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre between Cuba and United States of America?
19,166 current LCU per square kilometre, with United States of America ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and United States of America?
25 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2021.
How do Cuba and United States of America rank globally for taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Cuba ranks 161st and United States of America ranks 158th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs United States of America: Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/taxes-less-subsidies-on-products-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/cuba/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/taxes-less-subsidies-on-products-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/cuba/united-states/">Cuba vs United States of America: Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
196 places, 7,867 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.