Chad vs Eswatini: Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre

Chad
328,159 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini
345,501 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Chad rank
122nd
Eswatini rank
121st

Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Chad
  • Eswatini
0100.0k200.0k300.0k196119922023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 345,501 current LCU per square kilometre against 328,159 current LCU per square kilometre in Chad, a difference of 17,342 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Chad's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chad ahead.

Chad ranks 122nd and Eswatini ranks 121st of 195 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 3 and Eswatini in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Eswatini Difference Ahead
1960s 3,836 current LCU per square kilometre 154.19 current LCU per square kilometre 3,682 current LCU per square kilometre Chad
1970s 3,434 current LCU per square kilometre 1,737 current LCU per square kilometre 1,697 current LCU per square kilometre Chad
1980s 6,540 current LCU per square kilometre 8,416 current LCU per square kilometre 1,876 current LCU per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 19,373 current LCU per square kilometre 52,966 current LCU per square kilometre 33,593 current LCU per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 55,473 current LCU per square kilometre 49,128 current LCU per square kilometre 6,345 current LCU per square kilometre Chad
2010s 155,587 current LCU per square kilometre 173,949 current LCU per square kilometre 18,361 current LCU per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 272,496 current LCU per square kilometre 316,076 current LCU per square kilometre 43,580 current LCU per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre, Chad or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 345,501 current LCU per square kilometre against 328,159 current LCU per square kilometre in Chad as of 2023.
What is the difference in taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre between Chad and Eswatini?
17,342 current LCU per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Eswatini?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chad and Eswatini rank globally for taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Chad ranks 122nd and Eswatini ranks 121st of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Eswatini: Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/taxes-less-subsidies-on-products-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/chad/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/taxes-less-subsidies-on-products-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/chad/eswatini/">Chad vs Eswatini: Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
196 places, 7,867 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.