Cameroon vs Malta: Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre

Cameroon
4.32 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta
4.68 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Cameroon rank
55th
Malta rank
52nd

Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Cameroon
  • Malta
01.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M5.0M196519942023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 4.68 million current LCU per square kilometre against 4.32 million current LCU per square kilometre in Cameroon, a difference of 362,740 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Malta's figure about 1.1 times Cameroon's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Malta ahead.

Cameroon ranks 55th and Malta ranks 52nd of 195 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Cameroon averaged higher in 1 and Malta in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cameroon Malta Difference Ahead
1970s -0.0343 current LCU per square kilometre 91,953 current LCU per square kilometre 91,953 current LCU per square kilometre Malta
1980s 289,429 current LCU per square kilometre 230,619 current LCU per square kilometre 58,811 current LCU per square kilometre Cameroon
1990s 634,554 current LCU per square kilometre 859,400 current LCU per square kilometre 224,847 current LCU per square kilometre Malta
2000s 1.62 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.95 million current LCU per square kilometre 333,529 current LCU per square kilometre Malta
2010s 2.90 million current LCU per square kilometre 3.47 million current LCU per square kilometre 570,941 current LCU per square kilometre Malta
2020s 4.05 million current LCU per square kilometre 4.18 million current LCU per square kilometre 131,812 current LCU per square kilometre Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre, Cameroon or Malta?
Malta, at 4.68 million current LCU per square kilometre against 4.32 million current LCU per square kilometre in Cameroon as of 2023.
What is the difference in taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre between Cameroon and Malta?
362,740 current LCU per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Malta?
53 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Cameroon and Malta rank globally for taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Cameroon ranks 55th and Malta ranks 52nd of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cameroon vs Malta: Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/taxes-less-subsidies-on-products-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/cameroon/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/taxes-less-subsidies-on-products-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/cameroon/malta/">Cameroon vs Malta: Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
196 places, 7,867 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.