Brazil vs Lesotho: Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre

Brazil
165,677 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Lesotho
185,338 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
141st
Lesotho rank
138th

Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Brazil
  • Lesotho
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k196119922023

How they compare

Lesotho currently reports 185,338 current LCU per square kilometre against 165,677 current LCU per square kilometre in Brazil, a difference of 19,661 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Lesotho's figure about 1.1 times Brazil's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Lesotho ahead.

Brazil ranks 141st and Lesotho ranks 138th of 195 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Lesotho in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Lesotho Difference Ahead
1960s 0 current LCU per square kilometre 73.56 current LCU per square kilometre 73.56 current LCU per square kilometre Lesotho
1970s 0 current LCU per square kilometre 544.8 current LCU per square kilometre 544.8 current LCU per square kilometre Lesotho
1980s 0.0001 current LCU per square kilometre 1,882 current LCU per square kilometre 1,882 current LCU per square kilometre Lesotho
1990s 7,487 current LCU per square kilometre 7,811 current LCU per square kilometre 324.41 current LCU per square kilometre Lesotho
2000s 38,046 current LCU per square kilometre 28,140 current LCU per square kilometre 9,906 current LCU per square kilometre Brazil
2010s 97,775 current LCU per square kilometre 99,122 current LCU per square kilometre 1,347 current LCU per square kilometre Lesotho
2020s 150,774 current LCU per square kilometre 157,559 current LCU per square kilometre 6,785 current LCU per square kilometre Lesotho

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre, Brazil or Lesotho?
Lesotho, at 185,338 current LCU per square kilometre against 165,677 current LCU per square kilometre in Brazil as of 2023.
What is the difference in taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre between Brazil and Lesotho?
19,661 current LCU per square kilometre, with Lesotho ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Lesotho?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Lesotho rank globally for taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Brazil ranks 141st and Lesotho ranks 138th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Lesotho: Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/taxes-less-subsidies-on-products-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/brazil/lesotho/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/taxes-less-subsidies-on-products-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/brazil/lesotho/">Brazil vs Lesotho: Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
196 places, 7,867 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.