Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Brazil: Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre

Bosnia and Herzegovina
153,210 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil
165,677 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
143rd
Brazil rank
141st

Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Brazil
050.0k100.0k150.0k196119922023

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 165,677 current LCU per square kilometre against 153,210 current LCU per square kilometre in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 12,467 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Brazil's figure about 1.1 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Brazil ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 143rd and Brazil ranks 141st of 195 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 3 and Brazil in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Brazil Difference Ahead
1990s 15,385 current LCU per square kilometre 12,447 current LCU per square kilometre 2,938 current LCU per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2000s 64,604 current LCU per square kilometre 38,046 current LCU per square kilometre 26,558 current LCU per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 99,350 current LCU per square kilometre 97,775 current LCU per square kilometre 1,575 current LCU per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 131,695 current LCU per square kilometre 150,774 current LCU per square kilometre 19,078 current LCU per square kilometre Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Brazil?
Brazil, at 165,677 current LCU per square kilometre against 153,210 current LCU per square kilometre in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2023.
What is the difference in taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Brazil?
12,467 current LCU per square kilometre, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Brazil?
30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Brazil rank globally for taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 143rd and Brazil ranks 141st of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Brazil: Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/taxes-less-subsidies-on-products-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/brazil/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/taxes-less-subsidies-on-products-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/brazil/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Brazil: Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
196 places, 7,867 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.