Gabon vs Sri Lanka: Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per capita
Gabon
178,782 current LCU per person
in 2025
Sri Lanka
174,118 current LCU per person
in 2025
Gabon rank
28th
Sri Lanka rank
29th
Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per capita over time
- Gabon
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Gabon currently reports 178,782 current LCU per person against 174,118 current LCU per person in Sri Lanka, a difference of 4,664 current LCU per person.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Gabon has been ahead every year.
Gabon ranks 28th and Sri Lanka ranks 29th of 197 countries.
Gabon has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gabon | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 337,188 current LCU per person | 43,617 current LCU per person | 293,570 current LCU per person | Gabon |
| 2020s | 186,310 current LCU per person | 84,120 current LCU per person | 102,190 current LCU per person | Gabon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per capita, Gabon or Sri Lanka?
- Gabon, at 178,782 current LCU per person against 174,118 current LCU per person in Sri Lanka as of 2025.
- What is the difference in taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per capita between Gabon and Sri Lanka?
- 4,664 current LCU per person, with Gabon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gabon and Sri Lanka?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2025.
- How do Gabon and Sri Lanka rank globally for taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per capita?
- Gabon ranks 28th and Sri Lanka ranks 29th of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.