Qatar vs Zimbabwe: Taxes less subsidies on products
Qatar
4.18 billion constant LCU
in 2025
Zimbabwe
4.13 billion constant LCU
in 2025
Qatar rank
133rd
Zimbabwe rank
135th
Taxes less subsidies on products over time
- Qatar
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Qatar currently reports 4.18 billion constant LCU against 4.13 billion constant LCU in Zimbabwe, a difference of 52.03 million constant LCU.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Qatar ranks 133rd and Zimbabwe ranks 135th of 189 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Qatar | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.49 billion constant LCU | 4.46 billion constant LCU | 1.97 billion constant LCU | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 2.47 billion constant LCU | 5.25 billion constant LCU | 2.78 billion constant LCU | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 3.70 billion constant LCU | 3.75 billion constant LCU | 52.01 million constant LCU | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher taxes less subsidies on products, Qatar or Zimbabwe?
- Qatar, at 4.18 billion constant LCU against 4.13 billion constant LCU in Zimbabwe as of 2025.
- What is the difference in taxes less subsidies on products between Qatar and Zimbabwe?
- 52.03 million constant LCU, with Qatar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Qatar and Zimbabwe?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2025.
- How do Qatar and Zimbabwe rank globally for taxes less subsidies on products?
- Qatar ranks 133rd and Zimbabwe ranks 135th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Taxes less subsidies on products are taxes payable per unit of a good or service. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.