Botswana vs Georgia: Taxes less subsidies on products
Taxes less subsidies on products over time
- Botswana
- Georgia
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 8.40 billion constant LCU against 7.37 billion constant LCU in Georgia, a difference of 1.04 billion constant LCU.
That makes Botswana's figure about 1.1 times Georgia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Georgia ahead.
Botswana ranks 118th and Georgia ranks 120th of 189 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 2 and Georgia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.86 billion constant LCU | 3.93 billion constant LCU | 1.07 billion constant LCU | Georgia |
| 2010s | 5.52 billion constant LCU | 5.43 billion constant LCU | 92.56 million constant LCU | Botswana |
| 2020s | 7.50 billion constant LCU | 6.26 billion constant LCU | 1.24 billion constant LCU | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher taxes less subsidies on products, Botswana or Georgia?
- Botswana, at 8.40 billion constant LCU against 7.37 billion constant LCU in Georgia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in taxes less subsidies on products between Botswana and Georgia?
- 1.04 billion constant LCU, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Georgia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2025.
- How do Botswana and Georgia rank globally for taxes less subsidies on products?
- Botswana ranks 118th and Georgia ranks 120th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Taxes less subsidies on products are taxes payable per unit of a good or service. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.