Netherlands vs North Macedonia: Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Netherlands
2.73 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
North Macedonia
2.60 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Netherlands rank
53rd
North Macedonia rank
55th

Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Netherlands
  • North Macedonia
01.0M2.0M3.0M196919962023

How they compare

Netherlands currently reports 2.73 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 2.60 million constant LCU per square kilometre in North Macedonia, a difference of 131,630 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Netherlands's figure about 1.1 times North Macedonia's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Netherlands has been ahead every year.

Netherlands ranks 53rd and North Macedonia ranks 55th of 186 countries.

Netherlands has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Netherlands North Macedonia Difference Ahead
1990s 1.97 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.40 million constant LCU per square kilometre 565,549 constant LCU per square kilometre Netherlands
2000s 2.55 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.75 million constant LCU per square kilometre 797,654 constant LCU per square kilometre Netherlands
2010s 2.54 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.29 million constant LCU per square kilometre 245,052 constant LCU per square kilometre Netherlands
2020s 2.73 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.51 million constant LCU per square kilometre 223,992 constant LCU per square kilometre Netherlands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher taxes less subsidies on products (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Netherlands or North Macedonia?
Netherlands, at 2.73 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 2.60 million constant LCU per square kilometre in North Macedonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in taxes less subsidies on products (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Netherlands and North Macedonia?
131,630 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Netherlands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Netherlands and North Macedonia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Netherlands and North Macedonia rank globally for taxes less subsidies on products (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Netherlands ranks 53rd and North Macedonia ranks 55th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Netherlands vs North Macedonia: Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/taxes-less-subsidies-on-products-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/netherlands/north-macedonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/taxes-less-subsidies-on-products-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/netherlands/north-macedonia/">Netherlands vs North Macedonia: Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
187 places, 6,809 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.