Jamaica vs Mauritius: Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Jamaica
28.54 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius
29.20 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Jamaica rank
19th
Mauritius rank
18th

Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Jamaica
  • Mauritius
10.0M20.0M30.0M196619942023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 29.20 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 28.54 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Jamaica, a difference of 658,400 constant LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 48 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Jamaica ahead.

Jamaica ranks 19th and Mauritius ranks 18th of 186 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 4 and Mauritius in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jamaica Mauritius Difference Ahead
1970s 15.79 million constant LCU per square kilometre 8.01 million constant LCU per square kilometre 7.77 million constant LCU per square kilometre Jamaica
1980s 21.61 million constant LCU per square kilometre 9.73 million constant LCU per square kilometre 11.88 million constant LCU per square kilometre Jamaica
1990s 23.35 million constant LCU per square kilometre 17.05 million constant LCU per square kilometre 6.31 million constant LCU per square kilometre Jamaica
2000s 24.44 million constant LCU per square kilometre 19.32 million constant LCU per square kilometre 5.11 million constant LCU per square kilometre Jamaica
2010s 24.67 million constant LCU per square kilometre 27.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.56 million constant LCU per square kilometre Mauritius
2020s 26.78 million constant LCU per square kilometre 28.00 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.22 million constant LCU per square kilometre Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher taxes less subsidies on products (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Jamaica or Mauritius?
Mauritius, at 29.20 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 28.54 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Jamaica as of 2023.
What is the difference in taxes less subsidies on products (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Jamaica and Mauritius?
658,400 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Mauritius?
48 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2023.
How do Jamaica and Mauritius rank globally for taxes less subsidies on products (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Jamaica ranks 19th and Mauritius ranks 18th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jamaica vs Mauritius: Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/taxes-less-subsidies-on-products-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/taxes-less-subsidies-on-products-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/mauritius/">Jamaica vs Mauritius: Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
187 places, 6,809 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.