Finland vs New Zealand: Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Finland
97,709 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand
114,375 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Finland rank
134th
New Zealand rank
131st

Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Finland
  • New Zealand
20.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k120.0k197019962023

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 114,375 constant LCU per square kilometre against 97,709 constant LCU per square kilometre in Finland, a difference of 16,666 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.2 times Finland's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 47 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Finland ahead.

Finland ranks 134th and New Zealand ranks 131st of 186 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 5 and New Zealand in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Finland New Zealand Difference Ahead
1970s 42,653 constant LCU per square kilometre 27,362 constant LCU per square kilometre 15,292 constant LCU per square kilometre Finland
1980s 53,441 constant LCU per square kilometre 32,727 constant LCU per square kilometre 20,713 constant LCU per square kilometre Finland
1990s 60,366 constant LCU per square kilometre 46,711 constant LCU per square kilometre 13,655 constant LCU per square kilometre Finland
2000s 82,690 constant LCU per square kilometre 69,605 constant LCU per square kilometre 13,084 constant LCU per square kilometre Finland
2010s 100,955 constant LCU per square kilometre 90,121 constant LCU per square kilometre 10,833 constant LCU per square kilometre Finland
2020s 103,907 constant LCU per square kilometre 110,033 constant LCU per square kilometre 6,126 constant LCU per square kilometre New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher taxes less subsidies on products (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Finland or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 114,375 constant LCU per square kilometre against 97,709 constant LCU per square kilometre in Finland as of 2023.
What is the difference in taxes less subsidies on products (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Finland and New Zealand?
16,666 constant LCU per square kilometre, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and New Zealand?
47 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2023.
How do Finland and New Zealand rank globally for taxes less subsidies on products (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Finland ranks 134th and New Zealand ranks 131st of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Finland vs New Zealand: Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/taxes-less-subsidies-on-products-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/finland/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/taxes-less-subsidies-on-products-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/finland/new-zealand/">Finland vs New Zealand: Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
187 places, 6,809 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.