Chile vs Mauritius: Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Chile
27.82 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius
29.20 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
20th
Mauritius rank
18th

Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Chile
  • Mauritius
010.0M20.0M30.0M196119922023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 29.20 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 27.82 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 1.37 million constant LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 48 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Mauritius ahead.

Chile ranks 20th and Mauritius ranks 18th of 186 countries.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Mauritius Difference Ahead
1970s 2.60 million constant LCU per square kilometre 8.01 million constant LCU per square kilometre 5.41 million constant LCU per square kilometre Mauritius
1980s 3.54 million constant LCU per square kilometre 9.73 million constant LCU per square kilometre 6.18 million constant LCU per square kilometre Mauritius
1990s 7.78 million constant LCU per square kilometre 17.05 million constant LCU per square kilometre 9.27 million constant LCU per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 13.63 million constant LCU per square kilometre 19.32 million constant LCU per square kilometre 5.69 million constant LCU per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 23.21 million constant LCU per square kilometre 27.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre 4.01 million constant LCU per square kilometre Mauritius
2020s 27.99 million constant LCU per square kilometre 28.00 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2,700 constant LCU per square kilometre Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher taxes less subsidies on products (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Chile or Mauritius?
Mauritius, at 29.20 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 27.82 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in taxes less subsidies on products (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Chile and Mauritius?
1.37 million constant LCU per square kilometre, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Mauritius?
48 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2023.
How do Chile and Mauritius rank globally for taxes less subsidies on products (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Chile ranks 20th and Mauritius ranks 18th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Mauritius: Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/taxes-less-subsidies-on-products-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/chile/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/taxes-less-subsidies-on-products-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/chile/mauritius/">Chile vs Mauritius: Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
187 places, 6,809 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.