Botswana vs Zambia: Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Botswana
13,743 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
10,478 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
167th
Zambia rank
168th

Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Botswana
  • Zambia
05.0k10.0k15.0k196519942023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 13,743 constant LCU per square kilometre against 10,478 constant LCU per square kilometre in Zambia, a difference of 3,265 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Botswana's figure about 1.3 times Zambia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Zambia ahead.

Botswana ranks 167th and Zambia ranks 168th of 186 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 2 and Zambia in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 87.74 constant LCU per square kilometre 1,963 constant LCU per square kilometre 1,875 constant LCU per square kilometre Zambia
1970s 352.18 constant LCU per square kilometre 2,471 constant LCU per square kilometre 2,118 constant LCU per square kilometre Zambia
1980s 912.45 constant LCU per square kilometre 2,837 constant LCU per square kilometre 1,925 constant LCU per square kilometre Zambia
1990s 2,048 constant LCU per square kilometre 3,912 constant LCU per square kilometre 1,864 constant LCU per square kilometre Zambia
2000s 4,276 constant LCU per square kilometre 5,018 constant LCU per square kilometre 741.8 constant LCU per square kilometre Zambia
2010s 9,737 constant LCU per square kilometre 9,187 constant LCU per square kilometre 549.91 constant LCU per square kilometre Botswana
2020s 12,485 constant LCU per square kilometre 9,760 constant LCU per square kilometre 2,725 constant LCU per square kilometre Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher taxes less subsidies on products (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Botswana or Zambia?
Botswana, at 13,743 constant LCU per square kilometre against 10,478 constant LCU per square kilometre in Zambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in taxes less subsidies on products (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Botswana and Zambia?
3,265 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Zambia?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Zambia rank globally for taxes less subsidies on products (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Botswana ranks 167th and Zambia ranks 168th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Zambia: Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/taxes-less-subsidies-on-products-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/botswana/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/taxes-less-subsidies-on-products-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/botswana/zambia/">Botswana vs Zambia: Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
187 places, 6,809 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.