Bosnia and Herzegovina vs New Zealand: Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Bosnia and Herzegovina
132,717 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand
114,375 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
129th
New Zealand rank
131st

Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • New Zealand
25.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k197720002023

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 132,717 constant LCU per square kilometre against 114,375 constant LCU per square kilometre in New Zealand, a difference of 18,342 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 1.2 times New Zealand's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Bosnia and Herzegovina has been ahead every year.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 129th and New Zealand ranks 131st of 186 countries.

Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina New Zealand Difference Ahead
2000s 81,983 constant LCU per square kilometre 69,605 constant LCU per square kilometre 12,378 constant LCU per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 105,104 constant LCU per square kilometre 90,121 constant LCU per square kilometre 14,982 constant LCU per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 125,432 constant LCU per square kilometre 110,033 constant LCU per square kilometre 15,399 constant LCU per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher taxes less subsidies on products (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Bosnia and Herzegovina or New Zealand?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 132,717 constant LCU per square kilometre against 114,375 constant LCU per square kilometre in New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in taxes less subsidies on products (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Bosnia and Herzegovina and New Zealand?
18,342 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and New Zealand?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and New Zealand rank globally for taxes less subsidies on products (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 129th and New Zealand ranks 131st of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs New Zealand: Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/taxes-less-subsidies-on-products-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/taxes-less-subsidies-on-products-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/new-zealand/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs New Zealand: Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
187 places, 6,809 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.