Malta vs Netherlands: SUT Share of imported products in GFCF at basic prices — Gross fixed

Malta
30.79 Percentage of gross fixed capital formation in the same product
in 2020
Netherlands
24.23 Percentage of gross fixed capital formation in the same product
in 2023
Malta rank
2nd
Netherlands rank
2nd

SUT Share of imported products in GFCF at basic prices — Gross fixed over time

  • Malta
  • Netherlands
01020304050201020162023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 30.79 Percentage of gross fixed capital formation in the same product against 24.23 Percentage of gross fixed capital formation in the same product in Netherlands, a difference of 6.56 Percentage of gross fixed capital formation in the same product.

That makes Malta's figure about 1.3 times Netherlands's.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.

Malta ranks 2nd and Netherlands ranks 2nd of 20 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Netherlands Difference Ahead
2010s 37.95 Percentage of gross fixed capital formation in the same product 26.54 Percentage of gross fixed capital formation in the same product 11.41 Percentage of gross fixed capital formation in the same product Malta
2020s 30.79 Percentage of gross fixed capital formation in the same product 23.84 Percentage of gross fixed capital formation in the same product 6.95 Percentage of gross fixed capital formation in the same product Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sut share of imported products in gfcf at basic prices — gross fixed, Malta or Netherlands?
Malta, at 30.79 Percentage of gross fixed capital formation in the same product against 24.23 Percentage of gross fixed capital formation in the same product in Netherlands as of 2020.
What is the difference in sut share of imported products in gfcf at basic prices — gross fixed between Malta and Netherlands?
6.56 Percentage of gross fixed capital formation in the same product, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Netherlands?
5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
How do Malta and Netherlands rank globally for sut share of imported products in gfcf at basic prices — gross fixed?
Malta ranks 2nd and Netherlands ranks 2nd of 20 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as SUT Share of imported products in GFCF at basic prices — Gross fixed capital formation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Netherlands: SUT Share of imported products in GFCF at basic prices — Gross fixed. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/sut-share-of-imported-products-in-gfcf-at-basic-prices-gross-fixed-capital-formation/malta/netherlands-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/sut-share-of-imported-products-in-gfcf-at-basic-prices-gross-fixed-capital-formation/malta/netherlands-2/">Malta vs Netherlands: SUT Share of imported products in GFCF at basic prices — Gross fixed</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
SUT Share of imported products in GFCF at basic prices — Gross fixed capital formation
Unit
Percentage of gross fixed capital formation in the same product
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
24 places, 318 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation or GFCF (also called investment) refers to acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets. Therefore, this indicator can have a negative value, in particular for use of domestic output, so the share of imported products in GFCF can be higher than 100 %. This indicator highlights the dependency on imports of GFCF for each product. For each product, the indicator is calculated as Import of the product used for final consumption expenditure by households / final consumption expenditure by households at basic prices of the same product. This indicator is calculated by the OECD from the Import Use table at basic prices and the Use table at basic prices reported to the OECD by countries in their answers to Supply and Use questionnaire. The dataset corresponds to SNA_TABLE45 dataset in the previous dissemination system. A mapping between the new codes and previous codes is available in SUT_INDICATOR_Codes_mapping Explore the OECD SUT webpage SUT webpage