Estonia vs Netherlands: SUT Share of imported products in GFCF at basic prices — Gross fixed
SUT Share of imported products in GFCF at basic prices — Gross fixed over time
- Estonia
- Netherlands
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 32.75 Percentage of gross fixed capital formation in the same product against 24.23 Percentage of gross fixed capital formation in the same product in Netherlands, a difference of 8.52 Percentage of gross fixed capital formation in the same product.
That makes Estonia's figure about 1.4 times Netherlands's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 1st and Netherlands ranks 2nd of 2 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Netherlands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 31.65 Percentage of gross fixed capital formation in the same product | 24.97 Percentage of gross fixed capital formation in the same product | 6.68 Percentage of gross fixed capital formation in the same product | Estonia |
| 2020s | 32.55 Percentage of gross fixed capital formation in the same product | 23.96 Percentage of gross fixed capital formation in the same product | 8.59 Percentage of gross fixed capital formation in the same product | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sut share of imported products in gfcf at basic prices — gross fixed, Estonia or Netherlands?
- Estonia, at 32.75 Percentage of gross fixed capital formation in the same product against 24.23 Percentage of gross fixed capital formation in the same product in Netherlands as of 2021.
- What is the difference in sut share of imported products in gfcf at basic prices — gross fixed between Estonia and Netherlands?
- 8.52 Percentage of gross fixed capital formation in the same product, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Netherlands?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
- How do Estonia and Netherlands rank globally for sut share of imported products in gfcf at basic prices — gross fixed?
- Estonia ranks 1st and Netherlands ranks 2nd of 2 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as SUT Share of imported products in GFCF at basic prices — Gross fixed capital formation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation or GFCF (also called investment) refers to acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets. Therefore, this indicator can have a negative value, in particular for use of domestic output, so the share of imported products in GFCF can be higher than 100 %. This indicator highlights the dependency on imports of GFCF for each product. For each product, the indicator is calculated as Import of the product used for final consumption expenditure by households / final consumption expenditure by households at basic prices of the same product. This indicator is calculated by the OECD from the Import Use table at basic prices and the Use table at basic prices reported to the OECD by countries in their answers to Supply and Use questionnaire. The dataset corresponds to SNA_TABLE45 dataset in the previous dissemination system. A mapping between the new codes and previous codes is available in SUT_INDICATOR_Codes_mapping Explore the OECD SUT webpage SUT webpage