Australia vs Canada: SUT Share of imported products in GFCF at basic prices — Gross fixed
SUT Share of imported products in GFCF at basic prices — Gross fixed over time
- Australia
- Canada
How they compare
Australia currently reports 15.98 Percentage of gross fixed capital formation in the same product against 14.18 Percentage of gross fixed capital formation in the same product in Canada, a difference of 1.8 Percentage of gross fixed capital formation in the same product.
That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times Canada's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 16th and Canada ranks 17th of 20 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Canada in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Canada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 14.61 Percentage of gross fixed capital formation in the same product | 14.74 Percentage of gross fixed capital formation in the same product | 0.1314 Percentage of gross fixed capital formation in the same product | Canada |
| 2020s | 14.72 Percentage of gross fixed capital formation in the same product | 13.82 Percentage of gross fixed capital formation in the same product | 0.8941 Percentage of gross fixed capital formation in the same product | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sut share of imported products in gfcf at basic prices — gross fixed, Australia or Canada?
- Australia, at 15.98 Percentage of gross fixed capital formation in the same product against 14.18 Percentage of gross fixed capital formation in the same product in Canada as of 2023.
- What is the difference in sut share of imported products in gfcf at basic prices — gross fixed between Australia and Canada?
- 1.8 Percentage of gross fixed capital formation in the same product, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Canada?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2022.
- How do Australia and Canada rank globally for sut share of imported products in gfcf at basic prices — gross fixed?
- Australia ranks 16th and Canada ranks 17th of 20 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as SUT Share of imported products in GFCF at basic prices — Gross fixed capital formation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation or GFCF (also called investment) refers to acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets. Therefore, this indicator can have a negative value, in particular for use of domestic output, so the share of imported products in GFCF can be higher than 100 %. This indicator highlights the dependency on imports of GFCF for each product. For each product, the indicator is calculated as Import of the product used for final consumption expenditure by households / final consumption expenditure by households at basic prices of the same product. This indicator is calculated by the OECD from the Import Use table at basic prices and the Use table at basic prices reported to the OECD by countries in their answers to Supply and Use questionnaire. The dataset corresponds to SNA_TABLE45 dataset in the previous dissemination system. A mapping between the new codes and previous codes is available in SUT_INDICATOR_Codes_mapping Explore the OECD SUT webpage SUT webpage