Mexico vs OECD: Single commodity indicators — Transfers to consumers from taxpayers
Single commodity indicators — Transfers to consumers from taxpayers over time
- Mexico
- OECD
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 0 Euro against 0 Euro in OECD, a difference of 0 Euro.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Mexico ahead.
Mexico ranks 1st and OECD ranks 1st of 18 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 1 and OECD in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | OECD | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 154.1 Euro | 151.5 Euro | 2.61 Euro | Mexico |
| 2000s | 13.06 Euro | 35.01 Euro | 21.95 Euro | OECD |
| 2010s | 0 Euro | 7.16 Euro | 7.16 Euro | OECD |
| 2020s | 0 Euro | 3.96 Euro | 3.96 Euro | OECD |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher single commodity indicators — transfers to consumers from taxpayers, Mexico or OECD?
- Mexico, at 0 Euro against 0 Euro in OECD as of 2024.
- What is the difference in single commodity indicators — transfers to consumers from taxpayers between Mexico and OECD?
- 0 Euro, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and OECD?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
- How do Mexico and OECD rank globally for single commodity indicators — transfers to consumers from taxpayers?
- Mexico ranks 1st and OECD ranks 1st of 18 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Single commodity indicators — Transfers to consumers from taxpayers, for commodities. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset is a complement to the report Agricultural Policy Monitoring and Evaluation 2025, which monitors agricultural policy developments in 38 OECD member countries, 5 non-OECD European Union member states and 11 emerging and developing economies: Argentina, Brazil, People’s Republic of China, India, Indonesia, Kazakhstan, the Philippines, the Russian Federation, South Africa, Ukraine and Viet Nam. This table presents the core indicators of commodity-level data. The commodities used in this dataset have been reviewed and mapped to the Central Product Classification (CPC) Version 2.1 where relevant to facilitate international comparison. The mapping can be found here