Mongolia vs Peru: Share of Workers not classified by status in [industry] out of total
Share of Workers not classified by status in [industry] out of total over time
- Mongolia
- Peru
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 1.3 % against 0.95 % in Peru, a difference of 0.35 %.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.4 times Peru's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Peru ahead.
Mongolia ranks 8th and Peru ranks 10th of 33 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 1 and Peru in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.255 % | 1.69 % | 1.43 % | Peru |
| 2010s | 0.5667 % | 0.9517 % | 0.385 % | Peru |
| 2020s | 1.93 % | 0.79 % | 1.14 % | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of workers not classified by status in [industry] out of total, Mongolia or Peru?
- Mongolia, at 1.3 % against 0.95 % in Peru as of 2023.
- What is the difference in share of workers not classified by status in [industry] out of total between Mongolia and Peru?
- 0.35 %, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Peru?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
- How do Mongolia and Peru rank globally for share of workers not classified by status in [industry] out of total?
- Mongolia ranks 8th and Peru ranks 10th of 33 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Share of Workers not classified by status in [industry] out of total employment in [industry] by [sex]: Total employment — Value — Female — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.