Kyrgyzstan vs Viet Nam: Share of Workers not classified by status in [industry] out of total
Share of Workers not classified by status in [industry] out of total over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 19.34 % against 10.8 % in Viet Nam, a difference of 8.54 %.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.8 times Viet Nam's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Kyrgyzstan has been ahead every year.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 3rd and Viet Nam ranks 1st of 33 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of workers not classified by status in [industry] out of total, Kyrgyzstan or Viet Nam?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 19.34 % against 10.8 % in Viet Nam as of 2020.
- What is the difference in share of workers not classified by status in [industry] out of total between Kyrgyzstan and Viet Nam?
- 8.54 %, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Viet Nam?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2016.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Viet Nam rank globally for share of workers not classified by status in [industry] out of total?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 3rd and Viet Nam ranks 1st of 33 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Share of Workers not classified by status in [industry] out of total employment in [industry] by [sex]: Total employment — Value — Female — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.