Japan vs Peru: Share of Workers not classified by status in [industry] out of total
Share of Workers not classified by status in [industry] out of total over time
- Japan
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 0.95 % against 0.66 % in Japan, a difference of 0.29 %.
That makes Peru's figure about 1.4 times Japan's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Japan ahead.
Japan ranks 13th and Peru ranks 10th of 33 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 1 and Peru in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.28 % | 2.16 % | 0.885 % | Peru |
| 2010s | 0.915 % | 0.871 % | 0.044 % | Japan |
| 2020s | 0.75 % | 0.79 % | 0.04 % | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of workers not classified by status in [industry] out of total, Japan or Peru?
- Peru, at 0.95 % against 0.66 % in Japan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in share of workers not classified by status in [industry] out of total between Japan and Peru?
- 0.29 %, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Peru?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
- How do Japan and Peru rank globally for share of workers not classified by status in [industry] out of total?
- Japan ranks 13th and Peru ranks 10th of 33 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Share of Workers not classified by status in [industry] out of total employment in [industry] by [sex]: Total employment — Value — Female — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.