Jamaica vs Mauritius: Share of Workers not classified by status in [industry] out of total
Share of Workers not classified by status in [industry] out of total over time
- Jamaica
- Mauritius
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 0.24 % against 0.07 % in Mauritius, a difference of 0.17 %.
That makes Jamaica's figure about 3.4 times Mauritius's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Mauritius ahead.
Jamaica ranks 21st and Mauritius ranks 24th of 33 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.205 % | 0.4 % | 0.195 % | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 0.26 % | 0.488 % | 0.228 % | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of workers not classified by status in [industry] out of total, Jamaica or Mauritius?
- Jamaica, at 0.24 % against 0.07 % in Mauritius as of 2014.
- What is the difference in share of workers not classified by status in [industry] out of total between Jamaica and Mauritius?
- 0.17 %, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Mauritius?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2014.
- How do Jamaica and Mauritius rank globally for share of workers not classified by status in [industry] out of total?
- Jamaica ranks 21st and Mauritius ranks 24th of 33 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Share of Workers not classified by status in [industry] out of total employment in [industry] by [sex]: Total employment — Value — Female — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.