Colombia vs Uganda: Share of Workers not classified by status in [industry] out of total
Share of Workers not classified by status in [industry] out of total over time
- Colombia
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 0.06 % against 0.05 % in Colombia, a difference of 0.01 %.
That makes Uganda's figure about 1.2 times Colombia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Uganda ahead.
Colombia ranks 28th and Uganda ranks 25th of 33 countries.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of workers not classified by status in [industry] out of total, Colombia or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 0.06 % against 0.05 % in Colombia as of 2017.
- What is the difference in share of workers not classified by status in [industry] out of total between Colombia and Uganda?
- 0.01 %, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Uganda?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2017.
- How do Colombia and Uganda rank globally for share of workers not classified by status in [industry] out of total?
- Colombia ranks 28th and Uganda ranks 25th of 33 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Share of Workers not classified by status in [industry] out of total employment in [industry] by [sex]: Total employment — Value — Female — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.