Brazil vs Portugal: Share of Workers not classified by status in [industry] out of total
Share of Workers not classified by status in [industry] out of total over time
- Brazil
- Portugal
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 0.34 % against 0.25 % in Portugal, a difference of 0.09 %.
That makes Brazil's figure about 1.4 times Portugal's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 17th and Portugal ranks 20th of 33 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of workers not classified by status in [industry] out of total, Brazil or Portugal?
- Brazil, at 0.34 % against 0.25 % in Portugal as of 2015.
- What is the difference in share of workers not classified by status in [industry] out of total between Brazil and Portugal?
- 0.09 %, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Portugal?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2009.
- How do Brazil and Portugal rank globally for share of workers not classified by status in [industry] out of total?
- Brazil ranks 17th and Portugal ranks 20th of 33 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Share of Workers not classified by status in [industry] out of total employment in [industry] by [sex]: Total employment — Value — Female — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.