Armenia vs Brazil: Share of Workers not classified by status in [industry] out of total
Share of Workers not classified by status in [industry] out of total over time
- Armenia
- Brazil
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 0.25 % against 0.16 % in Brazil, a difference of 0.09 %.
That makes Armenia's figure about 1.6 times Brazil's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 20th and Brazil ranks 22nd of 34 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of workers not classified by status in [industry] out of total, Armenia or Brazil?
- Armenia, at 0.25 % against 0.16 % in Brazil as of 2019.
- What is the difference in share of workers not classified by status in [industry] out of total between Armenia and Brazil?
- 0.09 %, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Brazil?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2015.
- How do Armenia and Brazil rank globally for share of workers not classified by status in [industry] out of total?
- Armenia ranks 20th and Brazil ranks 22nd of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Share of Workers not classified by status in [industry] out of total employment in [industry] by [sex]: Total employment — Value — Male — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.