Myanmar vs Zambia: Share of Self-employed people in [industry] out of total employment
Share of Self-employed people in [industry] out of total employment over time
- Myanmar
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 65.82 % against 60.85 % in Myanmar, a difference of 4.97 %.
That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Myanmar's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Zambia ahead.
Myanmar ranks 7th and Zambia ranks 4th of 68 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Myanmar | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 63.83 % | 66.16 % | 2.33 % | Zambia |
| 2020s | 60.85 % | 68.11 % | 7.26 % | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of self-employed people in [industry] out of total employment, Myanmar or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 65.82 % against 60.85 % in Myanmar as of 2024.
- What is the difference in share of self-employed people in [industry] out of total employment between Myanmar and Zambia?
- 4.97 %, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Zambia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2020.
- How do Myanmar and Zambia rank globally for share of self-employed people in [industry] out of total employment?
- Myanmar ranks 7th and Zambia ranks 4th of 68 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Share of Self-employed people in [industry] out of total employment in [industry] by [sex]: Total employment — Value — Male — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.