Mongolia vs New Zealand: Share of people (15+) who report having an account at a bank (by)
Share of people (15+) who report having an account at a bank (by) over time
- Mongolia
- New Zealand
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 97.51 % against 97.16 % in New Zealand, a difference of 0.35 %.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2011 it was New Zealand ahead.
Mongolia ranks 20th and New Zealand ranks 21st of 97 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 84.65 % | 99.42 % | 14.77 % | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 97.7 % | 97.69 % | 0.005 % | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of people (15+) who report having an account at a bank (by), Mongolia or New Zealand?
- Mongolia, at 97.51 % against 97.16 % in New Zealand as of 2024.
- What is the difference in share of people (15+) who report having an account at a bank (by) between Mongolia and New Zealand?
- 0.35 %, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and New Zealand?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2024.
- How do Mongolia and New Zealand rank globally for share of people (15+) who report having an account at a bank (by)?
- Mongolia ranks 20th and New Zealand ranks 21st of 97 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Share of people (15+) who report having an account at a bank (by themselves or with someone else) — Value — Male — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.