Brazil vs Kyrgyzstan: Share of Employees in [industry] out of total employment in
Share of Employees in [industry] out of total employment in over time
- Brazil
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 65.63 % against 65.12 % in Brazil, a difference of 0.51 %.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 38th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 37th of 68 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 65.32 % | 57.12 % | 8.2 % | Brazil |
| 2020s | 63.7 % | 64.57 % | 0.865 % | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of employees in [industry] out of total employment in, Brazil or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 65.63 % against 65.12 % in Brazil as of 2023.
- What is the difference in share of employees in [industry] out of total employment in between Brazil and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.51 %, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Kyrgyzstan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2023.
- How do Brazil and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for share of employees in [industry] out of total employment in?
- Brazil ranks 38th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 37th of 68 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Share of Employees in [industry] out of total employment in [industry] by [sex]: Total employment — Value — Male — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.