Ecuador vs Myanmar: Share of Employees in [industry] out of total employment in
Share of Employees in [industry] out of total employment in over time
- Ecuador
- Myanmar
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 41.42 % against 37.05 % in Myanmar, a difference of 4.37 %.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Myanmar's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 54th and Myanmar ranks 57th of 68 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Myanmar in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 43.54 % | 35.29 % | 8.25 % | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 36.84 % | 37.05 % | 0.21 % | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of employees in [industry] out of total employment in, Ecuador or Myanmar?
- Ecuador, at 41.42 % against 37.05 % in Myanmar as of 2025.
- What is the difference in share of employees in [industry] out of total employment in between Ecuador and Myanmar?
- 4.37 %, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Myanmar?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2020.
- How do Ecuador and Myanmar rank globally for share of employees in [industry] out of total employment in?
- Ecuador ranks 54th and Myanmar ranks 57th of 68 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Share of Employees in [industry] out of total employment in [industry] by [sex]: Total employment — Value — Female — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.