Chile vs Kyrgyzstan: Share of Employees in [industry] out of total employment in
Share of Employees in [industry] out of total employment in over time
- Chile
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 72.95 % against 72.6 % in Chile, a difference of 0.35 %.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 32nd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 31st of 68 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 78.02 % | 59.82 % | 18.2 % | Chile |
| 2020s | 72.6 % | 70.64 % | 1.96 % | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of employees in [industry] out of total employment in, Chile or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 72.95 % against 72.6 % in Chile as of 2023.
- What is the difference in share of employees in [industry] out of total employment in between Chile and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.35 %, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Kyrgyzstan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for share of employees in [industry] out of total employment in?
- Chile ranks 32nd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 31st of 68 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Share of Employees in [industry] out of total employment in [industry] by [sex]: Total employment — Value — Female — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.