Cambodia vs Peru: Share of Employees in [industry] out of total employment in
Share of Employees in [industry] out of total employment in over time
- Cambodia
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 46.3 % against 41.82 % in Cambodia, a difference of 4.48 %.
That makes Peru's figure about 1.1 times Cambodia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Peru ahead.
Cambodia ranks 53rd and Peru ranks 50th of 68 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.51 % | 34.4 % | 15.89 % | Peru |
| 2010s | 36.48 % | 40.63 % | 4.15 % | Peru |
| 2020s | 40.08 % | 40.11 % | 0.0233 % | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of employees in [industry] out of total employment in, Cambodia or Peru?
- Peru, at 46.3 % against 41.82 % in Cambodia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in share of employees in [industry] out of total employment in between Cambodia and Peru?
- 4.48 %, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Peru?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Cambodia and Peru rank globally for share of employees in [industry] out of total employment in?
- Cambodia ranks 53rd and Peru ranks 50th of 68 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Share of Employees in [industry] out of total employment in [industry] by [sex]: Total employment — Value — Female — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.